(On May 10, 2007, I was one
of eight co-defendants on trial for trespassing at the
Testimony and Statements for Aero 8 Trial – May 10, 2007
My name is Samuel Scott
Bass. I’m 45 years old. I’m married and have two nearly-adult
sons. I live in
I’m here to testify that
what we did on April 9th was an expression of responsible
citizenship, of moral and ethical decency, and for me it was a compelling need
to openly and clearly exercise my Christian faith. I will testify today as to how these things
are true and why the court should consider these things in its deliberations
today. My testimony today is on my own behalf
and that of my co-defendants. The best
way I can describe why I participated in the April 9th action is to
use the language of my Christian faith. This
group’s motivations can be described in other ways, but in order to understand
what compelled me most deeply to join this action it has to be expressed
through the language of my faith. On the
day I was arrested, I wore a t-shirt on which I had written, “Torture Endangers
Us All” and “Torture Dishonors Christ.”
First, I want to testify
that what we did was an expression of good, responsible citizenship. There is mounting evidence that our country
is torturing people and that our doing so has increased atrocities against US
citizens; we are in essence giving our enemies reason or excuse to torture
citizens of the
Since torturing others is
being shown to endanger
Secondly, doing what we
did on April 9th was an expression of our high regard for human life
and dignity, for moral decency and ethics.
Moral decency requires that when one has as strong evidence as we do
that a terrible wrong is being committed, especially one that endangers human
life, we must make it known.
This kind of moral law is
reflected in human institutions and laws, such as ethics guidelines and
statutes say that I as a North Carolina Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist
have a duty to warn and even to break confidentiality if I learn information
about someone being a danger to himself or
others. Those ethics guidelines come
from a basic sense of moral decency.) And
these kinds of things don’t only apply to the ethical requirements of
professionals. For example, the laws of
the State of
Too often I’ve remained
silent or spoken up in too quiet a voice when I observed wrong. I have often felt haunted by statements of
the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.. King said:
“He
who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to
perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really
cooperating with it.”
He also said:
“History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of
this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people,
but the appalling silence of the good people.”
I have often wondered if
I had lived in the midst of the early civil rights struggle, would I have been
guilty of passivity and silence or would I have protested as loudly as was
necessary to be heard?
Would I have spoken up for my brothers and sisters of African descent even
when it meant risking the violation of unjust and/or lesser laws?
Had I lived in
In both these historical
examples – the civil rights struggle in
the US and the rise of Nazi oppression, many citizens and authorities
cooperated by remaining silent. Most
appalling to me the Church by and large chose to cooperate sometimes explicitly
and sometimes implicitly with the wrongs being committed.
The most basic human
morality and ethics, as well as the teachings of my Christian faith, would have
demanded in those settings that I speak up and that I endure whatever
consequences might have come in those times and places (Nazi Germany and the
I take my Christian
religious convictions very seriously. I
also live in a country where I am constitutionally protected in my practice of
my faith, which practice includes acting when I see moral wrongs and also when
the Christian faith is misrepresented. We
live in a time when for several years the most powerful and visible official of
the United States government – President Bush - has been held up as a model for
the Christian leader and a model for moral values. President Bush has openly claimed his
devotion to Christ and he has claimed God’s approval for his administration, even
for his warmaking authority and his methods. Evidence has mounted that his methods include
not only the ‘normal’ atrocities of war, but also torturing people. Evidence also continues to mount that our
government’s torturing people is being carried out with the active cooperation
of pilots under the auspices of Aero Contractors and based in the
President Bush has grossly
misrepresented Christian faith – a faith whose founder is called the Prince of
Peace. Jesus taught that love of neighbor
is tantamount to love of God, and expected his followers to put into practice
love of those we most despise and even of our enemies. Within the practice of my Christian faith, I have
a responsibility to respond with actions and words to correct these gross
misrepresentations put forth by President Bush and his allies. I am required by my faith to do so even if I
must break human law to do it.
What’s interesting is
that in this country, I’m supposed to enjoy protections of my religious
practice and expression! So I’m
wondering whether today this court will say that I committed a criminal act in
entering an open gate to go onto someone else’s property to help stop human
beings from being kidnapped and tortured.
Or maybe the court will see that I was exercising Christian faith and
doing so in a way that caused no harm or impediment to anyone, did no damage
and infringed on no one else’s freedoms.
While I had contemplated
this decision for some time, I made my final decision to participate in the
action one day prior – on Easter Sunday.
That means that the previous week most Christians, including me, sat in
Churches and read about and mourned and remembered the torture of Jesus Christ
through whippings, beatings and ultimately being hung in what modern military
lingo might call a “stress position” on a cross. In Matthew 25 we find Jesus saying, “Whatever
you did to the least of my brothers and sisters, you did to me.”
As I prayed on Easter
Sunday, April 8th, still trying to make a final decision as to
whether I would participate in the April 9th action – an attempt to
deliver notices to gain the cooperation of Aero Contractors with an
investigation of torture being facilitated by its personnel - I came to the
conclusion that I had to act. I had to
act. To have stayed home would have been
condoning the torture of people, and in a spiritual and mystical sense
it would have been condoning the torture of Jesus, who said, “Whenever you did
it to the least of my brothers and sisters, you did it to me.” Knowing what I know about torture, knowing
what I know about Aero Contractors and
There’s another Martin
Luther King, Jr. quote that haunts me. King
said:
“The church must be reminded that it is not the
master or the servant of the state, but rather the conscience of the state. It
must be the guide and the critic of the state and never its tool. If the church
does not recapture its prophetic zeal, it will become an irrelevant social club
without moral or spiritual authority.”
My understanding of
Christian faith and of what following Christ is all about leads me to agree
with Dr. King. I am asking the court to
agree that free exercise of religion in this particular case is protected and
warranted in the way that we did it and that we were also acting in accordance
with good citizenship and moral decency.
In closing, I must mention
that Scripture readings for the Sundays following April 9th included
passages from the Book of Acts about the Apostle Peter and others being thrown
into jail and brought before the authorities for exercising their faith and
telling truths that people did not want to hear. In one instance Peter and John said to the authorities,
“Whether it is right in God’s sight to listen to you rather than to God, you
must judge; for we cannot keep from speaking about what we have seen and
heard.” The next time they were arrested
and brought before the authorities, the apostles explained, “We must obey God
rather than any human authority.”
I ask this court to agree
with us that in attempting to gain the cooperation of Aero Contractors and